01
Positioning
Where you sit in the head of the person who signs, not in your deck. The engine reads your claims against the claims already made by whoever ranks beside you, and flags every one that is not yours alone.
Claim overlap mapYour buyer never judges your page alone. They judge it against the four other tabs open next to it, in the ten seconds before they close nine of them. TeardownX App runs that comparison for you: your positioning, your live competitors, and the language your market already uses to describe the problem.
It returns the gaps that cost you the deal, ranked. Not a score out of 100.
One mail when it opens. No sequence, no newsletter, no sales call.
01 / The Run
The same sequence a teardown follows by hand, in the order it has to happen. Diagnosis before advice, every time.
teardown run --url acmeflow.io --market us
TOP FINDING
You are selling the feature the demo shows. Your buyers are buying the Monday morning it removes. Two competitors already say that out loud. That is the deal you are losing before anyone books a call.
Illustrative run on a made-up company. The engine is in private build, so nothing here is a customer result.
02 / The Engine
Most tools start where it is easy: readability, meta tags, a colour contrast score. Those change nothing about whether a buyer picks you. These four decide it.
01
Where you sit in the head of the person who signs, not in your deck. The engine reads your claims against the claims already made by whoever ranks beside you, and flags every one that is not yours alone.
Claim overlap map02
Who is actually buying, versus who the page is written for. Pulled from your own proof: case studies, reviews, the job titles in your testimonials, the language in your support docs.
Buyer versus audience gap03
The specific sentences doing the damage, in the order a visitor meets them. Headline, subhead, first proof point, pricing frame. Each one rewritten, with the reason it changed.
Ranked rewrites04
Where the ready buyers already are, and which of your current channels is arguing with your positioning instead of carrying it.
Fit and conflict list03 / What Lands
Not a dashboard you have to interpret. A document with the decisions already made, and the reasoning attached so you can disagree with it.
Not thirty issues in a list. Three, ordered by what they cost you, with the evidence for the order.
Headline, subhead, proof, CTA. Before and after, side by side, with the reason each line moved.
What the tabs beside you claim, where they are stronger, and the one position none of them has taken yet.
Ordered by effort against impact, so the first item can ship the same week you read it.
Every module is something already delivered by hand today, on real engagements, at a fixed fee. The app is that work made repeatable. It is not a new promise looking for a method.
04 / Straight Answers
No. There is no login and no free trial behind this page. It is in private build, which is the entire reason the waitlist exists.
A grader scores the page you already have. This one reads the pages you are being compared against and tells you which position is still open. The comparison is the product.
One senior B2B product marketer who has run this teardown by hand, personally, on real engagements. The framework is not theoretical. It is being automated because it already works.
Your address sits on a list. You get one mail when it opens, and one question before that asking which of the four reads you want first. Nothing else.
05 / The List
The list opens first, and shapes what ships first. That is the whole offer, and it is the honest one.
One mail when it opens. Nothing before it.